Kevin Weeden
Case Information & Details
Public records in the UK show legal proceedings associated with two individuals named Kevin Weeden.
1. Kevin Weeden (aged 67, of Victoria Avenue, Shanklin)
This individual, a convicted sex offender on the register for life, admitted to two charges of making indecent images of children. The case was heard at the Isle of Wight Magistrates Court. He was found to be in possession of ten indecent child images, including three Category A and seven Category B images, depicting children as young as three to five years old. These images were discovered after he was reported for taking pictures of children at Shanklin Regatta on August 10, 2023. No indecent images were found to have been taken at the regatta itself. Weeden had previously been placed on the Sex Offender's Register for life in 2000 following 12 indecent assault convictions against an underage girl. Magistrates adjourned the proceedings until August 25, 2026, for an all-options pre-sentence report.
Separately, a criminal case with reference 44LN0142423, involving a "WEEDEN, KEVIN," had a first hearing scheduled for June 16, 2026, at the Isle of Wight Combined Court. The listed offense details for this case are "Make indecent photograph / pseudo-photograph of a child."
2. Chief Inspector Kevin Weeden (Metropolitan Police)
Chief Inspector Kevin Weeden, based within the MO6 Public Order Planning Command Unit of the Metropolitan Police, is facing an accelerated misconduct hearing. The hearing is scheduled for July 14, 2026, at Patrick Dunne House, Sutton Police Station.
The allegations against him include:
- Abusing his position for a sexual purpose in relation to a junior female colleague between August 2024 and February 2025. This involved pursuing a sexual and/or emotional relationship, engaging in inappropriate communications, and failing to declare or manage the relationship despite the officer working under his supervision.
- Engaging in persistent and unwanted contact with the same officer between November 2024 and February 2026, continuing to send communications despite being asked to stop.
These actions are alleged to be breaches of the Standards of Professional Behaviour, specifically in respect of Discreditable Conduct, Authority, Respect, and Courtesy, Orders and Instructions, Equality & Diversity, and Duties and Responsibilities. If proven, this conduct amounts to gross misconduct, which could justify dismissal.